Anomaly•Registry
AR-0105

The Lake Nyos Disaster

Later explained
Date 21 August 1986
Location Lake Nyos, North-West Region, Cameroon
Coordinates 6.4381, 10.2989

Summary

On the evening of 21 August 1986 a cloud of carbon dioxide rose out of Lake Nyos in Cameroon and killed about 1,700 people in the valleys below it. The gas had been dissolved in the lake's deep water, and the explanation, a limnic eruption, is now the accepted one.

There was no fire, no lava and no blast that anyone saw. People heard rumbling from the lake, smelled something like rotten eggs or gunpowder, and lost consciousness. Survivors woke hours later to find their lamps out, their animals dead, and members of their families dead. Two years earlier, beside Lake Monoun, 95 kilometres away, 37 people had died in the same way.

The answer came out of the lake itself. Water drawn up from its bottom fizzed like an opened bottle. The lake had been storing gas that seeps up from below, and in one night it let the gas go. Since 2001, pipes have been letting it go slowly.

the lake in section: one chain reaction, run two ways 21 AUGUST 1986 SINCE JANUARY 2001 CO2-rich water 208 m CO2-rich water the deep water overturned about 1 km³ of CO2 in one night about 1,700 people dead pipes lift the deep water first pipe 2001, two more 2011 one pipe can match the recharge SAME CHAIN REACTION. TWO SPEEDS. rising deep water loses pressure and its gas comes out; the column lightens, rises faster and pulls up more water. in 1986 the lake ran it all at once. the pipes run it slowly.
Figure Drawn by Anomaly Registry from the 1987 report of the US scientific team (USGS Open-File Report 87-97), Tanyileke and colleagues (2019) and Halbwachs, Sabroux and Kayser (2020). Not to scale. In 1986 the lake's gas-charged deep water overturned all at once; since 2001 pipes have lifted the same water and vented the gas slowly.

What is documented

The lake. Lake Nyos fills a volcanic crater (a maar) in the Oku Volcanic Field, on the Cameroon Volcanic Line, about 310 kilometres north-west of Yaoundé. The United States scientific team sent after the disaster measured it at 1,925 metres long, 1,180 metres wide and 208 metres deep, with a surface area of 1.58 square kilometres. Its outlet spillway, the team noted, is formed of "relatively weak pyroclastic ash beds".

The evening. 21 August 1986 was a Thursday. The US team's reconstruction, built from survivor interviews, is that by about 21:30 the weather was calm and most people were engaged in their usual evening activities when a series of rumbling sounds, lasting perhaps 15 to 20 seconds, came from the lake. People near the lake came out of their houses, felt a warm sensation, smelled rotten eggs or gunpowder, and rapidly lost consciousness. Survivors woke 6 to 36 hours later. Many found that their oil lamps had gone out with oil still in them.

The dead. The US team reported that about 1,700 people and 3,000 cattle died near the lake and along drainages up to 10 kilometres north of it, over an area of about 29 square kilometres. Subum, about 10 kilometres from the lake, was among the villages hit; Time named Nyos, Subum and Cha as the worst affected. The Smithsonian Institution's Scientific Event Alert Network bulletin for August 1986 traced a western tongue of gas along the Cha valley for about 15 kilometres. Within days the UN Disaster Relief coordinator in Geneva put the toll at 1,746, and most of the dead were buried in mass graves (Time, 8 September 1986). Time also reported perhaps 3,000 more people displaced from the fringes of the affected area.

The lake afterwards. The US report describes the water after the event as rusty red, with mats of vegetation floating on it, and its level about a metre lower. A water surge 6 metres high had overflowed the spillway, and water had washed up the southern shore to about 25 metres. The Smithsonian bulletin gives a larger figure for one spot, a surge onto a small peninsula on the south side that F. LeGuern measured at 80 metres above the lake. The sources seen by the registry do not reconcile the two. From the distribution of dead cattle, the US team judged that the gas cloud first rose about 100 metres above the crater rim.

What the water held. The US team arrived in Yaoundé on 27 August 1986. Water brought up from the bottom of the lake effervesced as it reached the surface: it was supersaturated with dissolved gas, and the gas was carbon dioxide. Depth soundings found no crater or disturbance on the lake bed. The team wrote that the water temperature, the composition of the dissolved gases and the low sulphur content of the water and sediments did not support recent, direct injection of volcanic gas, and estimated that the lake could have released about 1 cubic kilometre of carbon dioxide. The Smithsonian bulletin recorded no evidence of hydrogen cyanide or carbon monoxide.

The medical findings. Peter Baxter and two colleagues reported in 1989 that the clinical findings in 845 survivors seen at or admitted to hospital were compatible with exposure to an asphyxiant gas. Reddened skin and blisters on 161 of them (19 per cent) had at first been taken for burns from acid gases; further investigation suggested they were associated with coma states caused by the carbon dioxide. The authors did not exclude other toxic factors.

Monoun, two years earlier. In August 1984, 37 people died beside Lake Monoun, about 95 kilometres south-east of Nyos, after walking into a visible cloud around the lake. A team led by the volcanologist Haraldur Sigurdsson traced the gas to carbon dioxide of volcanic origin, stored in the lake's deep water and released after a landslide from the eastern crater rim slumped into it. Their paper dates the event to 15 August 1984; a Smithsonian bulletin report places the release before dawn on 16 August. According to Kevin Krajick, writing in Smithsonian in 2003, Science had rejected Sigurdsson's paper as far-fetched. It was published in March 1987, seven months after Nyos.

Degassing. Test experiments began at Monoun in 1992 and at Nyos in 1995. A single permanent pipe went into operation at Nyos in January 2001 and at Monoun in 2003, and two more pipes were added at Monoun in 2006 and at Nyos in 2011 (Tanyileke and colleagues, 2019). Each pipe is self-siphoning: once deep water has been started up it, the gas coming out of solution lightens the column and keeps the flow going without a pump. Krajick reported the first Nyos jet at 148 feet (about 45 metres). In 2005 George Kling and colleagues reported that both lakes had been recharging with carbon dioxide at up to 80 moles per square metre per year, and that a single pipe would remove only about 30 per cent of the remaining gas at Monoun before recharge balanced it, and about 25 per cent at Nyos by 2015. They called for more pipes. In 2008 Minoru Kusakabe and colleagues reported that the carbon dioxide in Nyos still amounted to 80 per cent of its maximum level.

The scientific legacy. An international working group on crater lakes was formed at a conference in Yaoundé in 1987. In 1993 it became the Commission on Volcanic Lakes of the International Association of Volcanology and Chemistry of the Earth's Interior (Rouwet, Tanyileke and Costa, 2016).

Leading explanations

Limnic eruption: carbon dioxide stored in the deep water and released when the lake overturned. Established.

Carbon dioxide of magmatic origin seeps into the bottom of the lake and dissolves in the deep water, which stays down because it is denser than the water above it and is held under pressure (Kling and colleagues, 1987). Over years the deep water approaches saturation. If some of it is lifted, the pressure on it falls, gas comes out of solution, and the bubbling water becomes lighter and rises faster, drawing more deep water up behind it. The process runs away until much of the stored gas has escaped. Carbon dioxide is about one and a half times as dense as air, so the cloud spilled over the crater rim and ran down the valleys to the villages.

The case for it is cumulative: the fizzing deep water, the undisturbed lake bed, the temperature and sulphur evidence against an injection of volcanic gas, and above all the lake's behaviour afterwards. Its deep water filled with carbon dioxide again, as a lake that stores gas should. Rouwet, Tanyileke and Costa (2016) note that it was this natural recharge that made the limnic explanation the accepted one. Every degassing design since has been built on it.

Phreatic eruption through the lake (Haroun Tazieff). Not accepted.

The volcanologist Haroun Tazieff argued that the gas came from an exceptionally CO2-rich phreatic eruption, as at the Dieng Plateau in Java in February 1979, where the erupting crater held no lake. In a 1989 paper he listed six observed facts that, he wrote, the eruptive hypothesis easily accounts for and the limnic one ignores. By his own account his was the first hypothesis put forward. It is now a minority position: the recharge measurements and three decades of controlled degassing have followed the limnic model.

The trigger (unknown).

What disturbed the lake that night is not known. The US team wrote that if the water was supersaturated before the event, "any small disturbance of the water column would initiate degassing". Proposals include a landslide or rockfall into the lake, an earthquake, and cold rain blown to one side of the lake by strong winds. The San Diego State University volcano site notes that there is little or no evidence that a landslide or an earthquake started it. At Monoun, by contrast, Sigurdsson's team did identify a landslide. The trigger is the open question. The mechanism is not.

What the popular version gets wrong

"Exactly 1,746 people died." The figure is precise; the count behind it was not. It was released within days by the UN Disaster Relief coordinator in Geneva, while most of the dead were being buried in mass graves. The US team gave at least 1,700 in its report and its 1987 paper in Science. A 1992 book chapter by S. J. Freeth, of the Geological Hazards Research Unit at Swansea, gives an estimated 1,250, and Krajick's 2003 account gives some 1,800. The number of dead is known to be large and is not known exactly.

"They died in their sleep." The release came at about 21:30, and the US team found that most people were still engaged in their usual evening activities. Time reported families finishing their evening meal. Many people near the lake came out of their houses at the noise and lost consciousness outside. Krajick reported that many victims were found where they would normally have been at that hour.

"A volcano erupted under the lake." That was the first hypothesis, and Tazieff defended it. The lake does sit in a volcanic crater, and its carbon dioxide is volcanic in origin. But the US team found no crater or disturbance on the bed, the water's temperature and chemistry argued against a fresh injection of volcanic gas, and the lake then refilled with carbon dioxide on its own. The volcano supplied the gas slowly, over years. The lake released it in one night.

"We still don't know why it happened." This was a ScienceAlert headline. It is known why it happened: the deep water held dissolved carbon dioxide close to saturation, and the lake overturned. What is not known is the disturbance that started the overturn, which, the US team pointed out, could have been any small disturbance if the water was supersaturated. An unknown trigger is not an unknown cause.

Current status

Later explained. The mechanism, a limnic eruption of carbon dioxide stored in stratified deep water, is established, and the same mechanism explains Monoun. The trigger at Nyos is unknown and may stay unknown, and that does not reopen the case.

The lake is no longer the hazard it was. Cameroonian scientists reported in 2019 that the degassing had brought the carbon dioxide in both lakes down to safe levels, and that reinforcement works had averted the feared collapse of the Nyos dam and the flood that would follow. Halbwachs, Sabroux and Kayser concluded in 2020 that a single pipe, running continuously, could match the natural recharge. A 2021 study stressed that the lake is still being supplied with carbon dioxide, and that regular surveys are needed to keep it safe. The registry found no new published assessment from 2025 or 2026. What would change this record is not a new theory but a failure: of the pipes, of the monitoring, or of the dam.

Sources

  • Tuttle, M. L., Clark, M. A., Compton, H. R., Devine, J. D., Evans, W. C., Humphrey, A. M., Kling, G. W., Koenigsberg, E. J., Lockwood, J. P. and Wagner, G. N. (1987). The 21 August 1986 Lake Nyos Gas Disaster, Cameroon: Final Report of the United States Scientific Team to the Office of U.S. Foreign Disaster Assistance of the Agency for International Development. U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 87-97.
  • Kling, G. W. and nine co-authors (1987). "The 1986 Lake Nyos gas disaster in Cameroon, West Africa." Science 236 (4798): 169 to 175.
  • Smithsonian Institution (1986). Report on Lake Nyos, Oku Volcanic Field. Scientific Event Alert Network Bulletin 11 (8), August 1986. Global Volcanism Program.
  • Smolowe, J. (1986). "Cameroon: The Lake of Death." Time, 8 September 1986.
  • Sigurdsson, H., Devine, J. D. and four co-authors (1987). "Origin of the lethal gas burst from Lake Monoun, Cameroun." Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research 31: 1 to 16.
  • Baxter, P. J., Kapila, M. and Mfonfu, D. (1989). "Lake Nyos disaster, Cameroon, 1986: the medical effects of large scale emission of carbon dioxide?" British Medical Journal 298: 1437 to 1441.
  • Tazieff, H. (1989). "Mechanisms of the Nyos carbon dioxide disaster and of so-called phreatic steam eruptions." Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research 39: 109 to 116.
  • Freeth, S. J. (1992). "The Lake Nyos gas disaster." In Freeth, S. J., Ofoegbu, C. O. and Onuoha, K. M. (eds), Natural Hazards in West and Central Africa. Wiesbaden: Vieweg, pp. 63 to 82.
  • Krajick, K. (2003). "Defusing Africa's Killer Lakes." Smithsonian, September 2003.
  • Kling, G. W., Evans, W. C., Tanyileke, G., Kusakabe, M., Ohba, T., Yoshida, Y. and Hell, J. V. (2005). "Degassing Lakes Nyos and Monoun: defusing certain disaster." Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 102 (40): 14185 to 14190.
  • Kusakabe, M. and eight co-authors (2008). "Evolution of CO2 in Lakes Monoun and Nyos, Cameroon, before and during controlled degassing." Geochemical Journal 42.
  • Pratt, S. E. (2014). "Benchmarks: August 15, 1984 & August 21, 1986: African killer lakes erupt." Earth magazine, American Geosciences Institute, 11 August 2014.
  • Rouwet, D., Tanyileke, G. and Costa, A. (2016). "Cameroon's Lake Nyos gas burst: 30 years later." Eos 97, 12 July 2016.
  • Tanyileke, G., Ntchantcho, R., Fantong, W. Y., Aka, F. T. and Hell, J. V. (2019). "30 years of the Lakes Nyos and Monoun gas disasters: a scientific, technological, institutional and social adventure." Journal of African Earth Sciences 150: 415 to 424.
  • Halbwachs, M., Sabroux, J.-C. and Kayser, G. (2020). "Final step of the 32-year Lake Nyos degassing adventure: natural CO2 recharge is to be balanced by discharge through the degassing pipes." Journal of African Earth Sciences 167: 103575.
  • Boehrer, B., Saiki, K., Ohba, T., Tanyileke, G., Rouwet, D. and Kusakabe, M. (2021). "Carbon dioxide in Lake Nyos, Cameroon, estimated quantitatively from sound speed measurements." Frontiers in Earth Science 9: 645011.

Last reviewed: September 2026. Records are provisional. Where the evidence changes, the entry changes. Found an error? Tell us.

Advertise on Anomaly Registry

A documentary archive of 175 investigated cases, read slowly and at length by an audience that arrives on purpose. Below are the current delivery figures and what is available to buy.

Figures are rolling daily averages, current as of September 2026. They are restated as the traffic changes rather than left to age quietly, and we are happy to screen-share the underlying Ad Manager and analytics reporting before an insertion order is signed.

Anomaly Registry is a reference archive rather than a feed. Every one of its 175 records is written to a fixed structure, sourced to contemporaneous documents, inquest files, peer-reviewed literature or credible reporting, and each carries a section setting out precisely what the popular version of the story gets wrong. Cases that were later explained and cases that were comprehensively debunked are kept alongside the unsolved ones, because an archive that keeps only its mysteries is not an archive. That editorial position is the reason people stay.

It also explains the shape of the traffic. A session here runs to more than four pages and close to nine minutes, which is several times what a typical content site sees. Readers arrive looking for one case, find the sources laid out, and follow the cross-references into the next record. For an advertiser, the practical consequence is that a banner on this site is in front of a settled, attentive reader for minutes rather than seconds, and it is seen repeatedly across a single visit without ever being the reason someone leaves.

Three placements are available on every page. The leaderboard sits above the masthead and accepts 728x90, 970x90 and 320x50. The in-article unit sits inside the body of the record, where the reader is already stopped, and accepts 728x90, 300x250 and 336x280. The footer unit closes the page and accepts 728x90, 970x90 and 320x50. There are three slots per page and there will not be a fourth: the inventory is deliberately limited so that each impression is worth more than it would be on a page carrying eight.

What we do not run matters as much as what we do. There are no interstitials, no pop-ups, no auto-playing video, no content-recommendation chumboxes, and nothing that reflows the page after the reader has started reading. Ads are served in reserved space so the layout does not jump. This protects viewability for the advertiser as directly as it protects the reading experience, and it is the reason we can quote the session figures above with a straight face.

The editorial environment is unusually safe for a subject area that is often anything but. This site does not publish conspiracy content, it does not promote pseudoscience, and it does not treat a rumour as a finding. Its entire method is to separate what is documented from what has merely been proposed, and to say plainly when a famous mystery has an unglamorous answer. A brand placed here sits next to sourced, corrected, carefully hedged writing rather than next to speculation dressed as news.

The readership is a general-interest one with a research habit: people who read long-form nonfiction, follow science and history coverage, and check citations. In practice the categories that fit well are books and publishing, documentary and streaming, museums and exhibitions, education and online courses, audio and podcasts, consumer technology, outdoor and travel, and financial services. If your product rewards attention and explanation rather than impulse, this is a good room to be in.

Everything is delivered through Google Ad Manager, so you can buy the way you already buy. Direct-sold campaigns can be trafficked as a guaranteed line item with standard reporting on impressions, viewability and click-through. Programmatic demand can reach the same inventory through the open auction or through a preferred deal or private marketplace at a floor we agree in advance. We accept standard IAB display creative and HTML5, and we can accommodate a reasonable third-party ad server or verification tag.

Category sponsorship is available for advertisers who want something more durable than a rotation. The register is organised into seven categories, and a sponsor can take the whole of one, appearing across every record inside it with an acknowledgement in the page furniture. Sponsorship never buys editorial influence: a sponsor cannot commission a record, cannot review one before publication, cannot have a record altered, and cannot have one removed. That rule is not negotiable and it is the thing that keeps the inventory worth buying.

Some categories are declined outright, and it is fairer to say so up front than to discover it after an insertion order. We do not accept adult content, gambling, payday or high-cost short-term credit, cryptocurrency speculation and token sales, dietary supplements making health claims, political advocacy, psychic or clairvoyant services, or anything that reads as a scare advertisement dressed up as an article. Nothing may be styled to look like a record or like part of the editorial page.

Rates depend on placement, volume, whether the buy is run-of-site or targeted to a category, and how long it runs. There is no rate card on this page because a sensible number depends on what you are trying to do, and quoting one in the abstract usually wastes both parties' time. Tell us the campaign, the flight dates and the budget you are working to, and you will get a straight answer including whether we think the fit is wrong.

To start, write to or use the contact form and mark the message for the advertising desk. Include the flight dates, the placements you want, the creative sizes you have ready and any verification requirements, and we will come back with availability and a quote. Media buyers who want the underlying analytics before committing are welcome to ask; we would rather show the reporting than be taken on trust.

Privacy Policy

This policy explains what information Anomaly Registry collects when you visit this website, why it is collected, how it is used, and what choices you have. It applies to anomalyregistry.com and to any subdomain operated by us. It was last updated on the date shown at the end of this policy, and we will revise it if our practices change.

We have designed this site to collect as little personal information as possible. You do not need an account to read anything here. There is no login, no user profile, and no comment system. In the ordinary course of reading the register, you are not asked to identify yourself, and we do not ask you to.

Like virtually every web server, ours produces access logs. These logs record the internet protocol address of the requesting device, the date and time of the request, the page or file requested, the referring page if one was sent, and the browser user agent string. These logs exist for security, abuse prevention, and diagnosing technical faults. They are retained for a limited period and then discarded. We do not use them to build profiles of individual readers.

If you write to us through the contact form, we receive whatever you choose to put into it: typically a name, an email address, and a message. We use that information for the sole purpose of reading and answering your message. Writing to us does not add you to any list, and we do not sell, rent, or trade contact details with anyone.

There is one optional mailing list, and you only join it by asking. If you submit the subscribe form we store the address you gave, the time you submitted it, the IP address it came from, and the exact wording of the consent you agreed to. We keep that record because Canadian anti-spam law expects us to be able to show when and how you asked to hear from us. The list is used to say that records have been published or materially revised, and for nothing else. Every message carries a way to leave, and asking to be removed by email works just as well.

Corrections are a special case, and worth stating plainly. If you write to point out an error in a record, we may act on that correction and revise the entry. We will not publish your name or your email address in connection with a correction unless you explicitly ask us to be credited.

This site is supported by advertising served through Google Ad Manager. Advertising technology providers may set and read cookies or similar identifiers on your device in order to select advertisements, limit how often you see the same advertisement, and measure performance. These identifiers are set by those third parties, not by us, and the data they collect is governed by their own privacy policies rather than this one.

We do not have access to the personal data that advertising partners collect, and we cannot delete it on your behalf. If you wish to limit interest-based advertising, you can adjust the advertising settings offered by Google, use your browser's cookie controls, or use the industry opt-out tools that are available in your region. Details are set out in our Cookie Policy.

We may use privacy-respecting aggregate analytics to understand which records are being read and how people move through the register. Where we do, we configure it to avoid collecting information that identifies individual readers. Aggregate figures tell us that a case page is popular; they do not tell us who read it.

We do not knowingly collect personal information from children. This site is a documentary archive intended for a general adult and older student readership. If you believe a child has sent us personal information through the contact form, write to us and we will delete it.

Depending on where you live, you may have rights over personal data relating to you, including the right to ask what we hold, to ask for a copy, to ask for correction, and to ask for deletion. Because we hold so little, these requests are usually simple to answer. Write to us and we will respond within the period required by the law that applies to you.

Our servers are located in North America, and information sent to this site is processed there. If you are visiting from elsewhere, your request necessarily crosses borders in order to reach us. By using the site you understand that this transfer takes place.

If we change this policy, the revised version will be posted here with a new date. Material changes will be noted plainly rather than buried. Questions about this policy should be sent through the contact page.

Cookie Policy

A cookie is a small text file that a website asks your browser to store, and that your browser sends back on later requests. Similar technologies, including local storage and pixel tags, do comparable work. This policy explains which of these are used on Anomaly Registry, by whom, and what you can do about them.

The registry itself is a reading site. It does not require a cookie to show you a record. We do not set cookies to track you across the internet, and we do not operate a first-party advertising identifier of our own.

Strictly necessary cookies may be set to keep the site secure and functioning, for example to help mitigate automated abuse of the contact form. These are limited in scope and are not used for advertising or profiling.

Advertising cookies are set by Google Ad Manager and by the advertising technology partners that operate within it. Their purposes include selecting which advertisement to show, capping the number of times a given advertisement is repeated, detecting invalid traffic and click fraud, and measuring whether an advertisement was actually seen.

Some of these advertising cookies support interest-based advertising, in which the advertisement you see is influenced by inferences drawn from browsing activity over time and across sites. Whether this occurs depends on your region, your settings, and the choices you have already made with those providers.

We may use aggregate analytics to count page views and understand which records are read. Where an analytics tool is used, we prefer configurations that do not identify individual readers and that do not follow readers across other websites.

We do not embed social media widgets, share buttons, or tracking pixels from social networks. This is a deliberate choice for an archive of this kind, and it removes an entire category of third-party tracking that most content sites carry.

Your browser gives you direct control over cookies. Every major browser can block third-party cookies, delete existing cookies, and clear stored data on exit. Blocking third-party cookies will not prevent you from reading anything on this site, though it may make the advertising you see less relevant.

You can also manage advertising preferences with Google directly through its advertising settings, and through the industry opt-out mechanisms operated in various regions. Because these are operated by third parties, we cannot make the choice on your behalf.

Where the law in your region requires consent before non-essential cookies are set, a consent notice will be shown and your choice will be respected. Withdrawing consent later is possible through the same mechanism.

Advertising partners may change over time. Rather than publish a list that goes stale, we identify the advertising system in use, which is Google Ad Manager, and direct you to Google's own disclosures for the current set of partners operating within it.

If you have a question about cookies on this site that this policy does not answer, write to us through the contact page and we will answer it.

Anomaly Registry is an independent documentary archive. It is published as a work of reference and public interest reporting, and it is supported by advertising. It is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any government, university, police service, coroner, scientific institution, or investigative body named in any record.

The register documents real events, including in some cases deaths, criminal investigations, and inquests. Where a record concerns a criminal matter, nothing on this site should be read as an allegation of guilt against any living person. Where an individual has been named in the public record, we report the fact of that naming and its evidentiary standing; we do not accuse.

Records are written from sources. Where a source is a primary document, we say so. Where a claim rests on secondary reporting, we say so. Where sources conflict, we state the conflict rather than quietly choosing a side. Where a widely repeated claim cannot be traced to any source, we say that too, because an untraceable claim is itself a finding.

Every record separates what is documented from what has been proposed. Hypotheses are labelled as hypotheses and attributed to whoever advanced them, together with their standing: peer-reviewed, contested, dismissed, or untested. We do not advance theories of our own.

The registry treats its own entries as provisional. Records carry a review date, and they are revised when the evidence changes. A record you read today may be corrected tomorrow, and that is a feature of the method rather than a defect in it.

Despite this method, errors will occur. If you find one, write to us. Corrections supported by evidence are made promptly, and we would rather be corrected than be consistent.

Scientific and forensic conclusions reported here are the conclusions of the researchers and officials who reached them, not ours. Reporting that a study proposed a mechanism is not an endorsement that the mechanism is correct, and the status assigned to a case reflects the state of the evidence rather than our opinion of it.

Nothing on this site is legal, medical, psychological, financial, or safety advice. Records that touch on medical or psychological matters, including mass psychogenic illness, report the diagnoses reached by clinicians at the time and afterward. They are not a substitute for professional care.

Quotations from sources are used sparingly and for the purposes of reporting, comment, criticism, and review. Copyright in quoted material remains with its owner. If you hold rights in material you believe has been used improperly, contact us and we will address it.

Original text, structure, record numbering, and editorial apparatus on this site are the property of Anomaly Registry. You are welcome to quote briefly and link to us. Wholesale reproduction of records, including reproduction for the purpose of training generative models, is not permitted without written permission.

Outbound links are provided as references. We do not control linked sites and are not responsible for their content, their accuracy, or their handling of your data.

This site is operated from British Columbia, Canada, and these notices are governed by the laws applicable there, without regard to conflict-of-law principles.

Accessibility Statement

Anomaly Registry is built to be usable by as many people as possible, including people who use screen readers, keyboard navigation, magnification, or other assistive technology. We treat accessibility as part of the build rather than as a later remediation.

We aim to meet the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines version 2.1 at level AA. This is a target we work toward continuously rather than a certification we claim to have completed.

The site is written as semantic HTML. Headings describe the real structure of a record, lists are marked up as lists, and the register is a genuine table with proper header cells, so that a screen reader can announce which column a value belongs to.

Every interactive element is reachable and operable by keyboard alone. Focus is visible at all times, and a skip link at the top of each page lets keyboard and screen reader users jump straight to the register without traversing the navigation.

Status is never conveyed by colour alone. Each status carries its written label in text, so a reader who does not perceive the colour difference between "Unsolved" and "Debunked" still receives the distinction.

Text colours have been chosen to meet or exceed the contrast ratios required at level AA against the page background. The typefaces are set at a comfortable reading size with generous line height, and the layout reflows to a single column on small screens without loss of content or function.

The site contains one animated element, an annotation on the home page. It respects the reduced-motion preference set in your operating system, and when that preference is on, the annotation appears without movement.

Text can be resized up to two hundred percent in the browser without breaking the layout or clipping content. Nothing on this site depends on a specific screen orientation.

Advertising is served by a third party. We control where advertisements are placed and label them as advertisements, but we do not control their internal markup, and their accessibility is ultimately determined by the advertiser.

We are developing an audio version of each record. When it is published, it will be an alternative way to receive the same content, not a replacement for the written entry, and the written entry will remain the authoritative version.

Accessibility work is never finished, and parts of this site will fall short of the standard we have set. If you encounter a barrier, we want to know about it. Please tell us what page you were on, what you were trying to do, and what assistive technology you were using.

Write to us through the contact page. We aim to respond within five business days and to fix genuine barriers promptly.

Terms of Use

These terms govern your use of anomalyregistry.com. By using the site you accept them. If you do not accept them, please do not use the site.

Anomaly Registry is offered as a free documentary reference. There is no account, no subscription, and no paywall, and nothing here is offered as a professional service of any kind.

You may read, quote briefly with attribution, link to, and print records for personal, educational, and research use. This is an archive, and it is meant to be used.

You may not reproduce records wholesale, republish the register or substantial parts of it, or scrape the site systematically. In particular, you may not reproduce this content for the purpose of training generative models. Permission for other uses can be requested through the contact page and is often granted.

Original text, the record numbering system, the status taxonomy, the editorial apparatus, and the design of this site are the property of Anomaly Registry. Third-party material quoted or referenced remains the property of its owners.

We work hard to make records accurate, and we correct them when they are not. Even so, the site is provided as it is, without warranty of any kind, express or implied, including any warranty of accuracy, completeness, or fitness for a particular purpose.

Records are provisional by design. A status can change, an identification can be confirmed or overturned, and a leading explanation can be displaced by a better one. Do not treat any record as a final word, and check the review date.

To the fullest extent permitted by law, Anomaly Registry and its operator are not liable for any loss or damage arising from your use of, or reliance on, anything published here.

If you send us a correction, a source, or a suggestion, you grant us permission to use it in the register. You will not be identified in connection with it unless you ask to be credited.

Do not use the contact form to send abuse, threats, spam, or automated submissions. We may block access to anyone who misuses the site or attempts to interfere with its operation.

Outbound links are provided as references and are not endorsements. We are not responsible for the content or conduct of any site we link to.

We may revise these terms. The version published here is the version in force. These terms are governed by the laws of British Columbia, Canada, and any dispute will be heard in the courts of that province.