The Southern Television Broadcast Interruption
Partially explainedSummary
On 26 November 1977 a voice claiming to speak for an alien "Galactic Command" replaced the sound of ITN's news for viewers of one Hampshire transmitter. Engineers explained within days how it was done; who did it has never been established.
The picture never changed. The network was never touched. Someone with a transmitter, standing close to a relay station that took its programme out of the air, simply spoke louder than the station it was listening to.
What is documented
The interruption. At 5:10 pm on Saturday 26 November 1977, during an ITN news summary carried by Southern Television, viewers who received their sound from the Hannington transmitter in north Hampshire heard it give way to a deep buzzing and then a distorted male voice. The picture carried on as normal. The interference ran on into the cartoon that followed the news.
The voice. It said it was the representative of the "Ashtar Galactic Command" and told its listeners that humanity must abandon its weapons: "All your weapons of evil must be removed." On surviving recordings the speaker's name sounds like "Vrillon". Newspapers at the time printed it as "Gillon" or "Asteron", and some called the command "Ashdown".
The duration. Accounts differ. The message itself lasted almost four minutes; normal sound returned after about five and a half; later accounts often say six minutes.
The reaction. Newspapers reported hundreds of telephone calls to Southern Television and dozens of emergency calls to the police. Later that evening Southern apologised on air "for the interference in sound experienced by some viewers". The Independent Broadcasting Authority (IBA), which owned and ran the transmitters, said the interruption was the first of its kind in the country.
How it was done. Hannington did not receive its programmes by landline. Unusually, it picked up the signal broadcast by the IBA's Rowridge transmitter on the Isle of Wight, about 70 kilometres to the south, and re-transmitted it. The IBA and Southern Television explained that a relatively low-powered transmitter very close to Hannington's receiving aerial could swamp the distant Rowridge signal, and the relay would then rebroadcast whatever it received. A Southern spokesman said a hoaxer had "jammed our transmitter in the wilds of North Hampshire by taking another transmitter very close to it." By 30 November the loophole had been closed.
The investigation. Hampshire Police, the Post Office, which was then responsible for tracing radio interference, and the IBA investigated. In December a Home Office spokesman said the investigation was complete, although nobody had been caught, and that there was little hope of finding the culprit unless the hoax was repeated. Nobody has ever been identified.
The name. "Ashtar" was not new. In 1952 the American contactee George Van Tassel had claimed telepathic messages from a being of that name, and by the mid-1950s an "Ashtar Command" was established in UFO-religious lore. The Aetherius Society, a British UFO religious movement, looked into the broadcast and agreed that it was a hoax.
Leading explanations
A hoax transmitted into Hannington's off-air receiver. Established. This was the explanation of the IBA and Southern Television within days, and it fits the facts: only viewers served by Hannington heard the voice, only the sound was affected, and the fault lay in the one link in the chain that listened to the air. The broadcasters closed the loophole by 30 November.
The perpetrator (unknown). The police, the Post Office and the IBA did not identify anyone, and the Home Office closed the inquiry in December 1977. Whoever built or borrowed the transmitter, and why, is the part of the case that remains open.
A message from space (the broadcast's own claim; rejected). The IBA, the police and the broadcaster treated it as a hoax from the start, and so did the Aetherius Society, a UFO religious group.
What the popular version gets wrong
"It has never been explained." How it was done was explained within days of the broadcast, by the authority that owned the transmitter, and the weakness was fixed. What has never been explained is who did it. By 1985 the story was already being retold, in at least one American newspaper, as one that had never been explained.
"An alien voice took over a British television channel." It took over the sound, not the picture, and only on Hannington's output. Southern Television's studios, ITN and the rest of the ITV network were never involved. The intrusion worked on one relay station that received its programme off the air.
"It was a feat of advanced technology." The IBA's own explanation was that a relatively low-powered transmitter near Hannington's receiving aerial would be enough. What mattered was being close to the aerial.
Current status
Partially explained. The method is settled: a local transmitter overpowered the off-air feed of a relay station, which rebroadcast the intruder's audio to its viewers. The loophole was closed within four days. The identity of the person or people responsible was never established, the official investigation ended in December 1977, and no one has since been identified. What would close the case is a credible, verifiable account from the perpetrator or a record from the 1977 investigation naming a suspect.
Sources
- Portsmouth Evening News, 28 November 1977. Report on the police hunt for the broadcaster.
- The Sunday Post, 27 November 1977. Front-page report on the interruption and viewers' calls.
- The Times (London), 28 November 1977. Report on the unidentified source of the broadcast.
- The Guardian, 28 November 1977. Report on the short-range transmission.
- Reading Evening Post, 28 and 30 November 1977. Reports on the hunt for the hoaxer and on engineers closing the loophole.
- Columbia Missourian, 21 March 1985. A retelling of the story as unexplained.
- Barnett, D. (2017). "Vrillon: the alien voice hoax that became a legend." The Independent, 25 November 2017.
Last reviewed: September 2026. Records are provisional. Where the evidence changes, the entry changes. Found an error? Tell us.