Anomaly•Registry
AR-0136

Mallory and Irvine

Partially explained
Date 8 June 1924. Mallory's body found 1999; part of Irvine's remains found 2024.
Location The Northeast Ridge and North Face of Mount Everest, Tibet Autonomous Region, China. The coordinates are the summit; the sources give no positions for the finds.
Coordinates 27.9878, 86.9253

Summary

On 8 June 1924 George Mallory and Andrew Irvine were seen high on the Northeast Ridge of Everest, climbing towards the summit, and did not return. Mallory's body was found in 1999 and part of Irvine's in 2024; whether either reached the top is still unknown.

A century of searching has partly established where the two men ended up and, broadly, how Mallory died. It has not produced the one object that might show how high they climbed: the camera they are believed to have carried.

the finds since the last sighting, 1924 to 2024, to scale 8 June 1924 last seen by Odell at 12.50 pm 1975 Wang Hongbao sees an 'English dead' September 2024 Irvine's foot, boot and name-labelled sock 30 May 1933 ice axe found just below the ridge crest 1 May 1999 Mallory's body found no camera no camera NO FIND YET SHOWS WHETHER THEY REACHED THE TOP. the remains show where the men came to rest, not their high point. the camera that might answer it has never been found.
Figure Drawn by Anomaly Registry from N. E. Odell's account in The Fight for Everest 1924, Hugh Ruttledge's Everest 1933, NOVA's 1999 expedition dispatches and National Geographic's report of October 2024. The timeline, to scale, marks each find since the last sighting; none bears on whether the two men reached the summit.

What is documented

The climbers. George Mallory, 37, had been on the British Everest expeditions of 1921 and 1922. Andrew "Sandy" Irvine, 22, was the youngest member of the 1924 expedition. With Noel Odell he was one of its two oxygen experts, and Mallory chose him as his partner partly for what the expedition's account calls his "peculiar genius for mechanical expedients" with the faulty oxygen apparatus. On 8 June 1924 they set out from Camp VI, the expedition's highest camp, climbing with oxygen, using the modified apparatus with two cylinders.

The last sighting. Odell was climbing alone below them in support. At about 26,000 feet the cloud cleared, and he saw on the ridge "a tiny object moving and approaching the rock step. A second object followed". The first climbed to the top of the step; then cloud covered the scene. He timed it at 12.50 pm. In the expedition's account, published in 1925, Odell wrote that he could not be precisely certain which of two steps on the ridge they were on. At the time he took it for the higher Second Step, but he had since become "a little doubtful" that it would have been visible from where he stood. If it was the Second Step, he noted, Mallory's schedule had them reaching it by 8 am at the latest. They were moving, he wrote, "as if endeavouring to make up for lost time".

No return. Mallory and Irvine did not come back. Odell climbed back up to Camp VI, found no sign of them, and laid out two sleeping bags in the form of a T on a snow patch, the agreed signal that no trace of the missing party could be found.

The ice axe, 1933. On 30 May 1933, on the first summit attempt of that year's British expedition, Percy Wyn Harris found an ice axe about 60 feet below the crest of the Northeast Ridge and 250 yards east of the First Step. It lay free on smooth, sloping slabs and, in the expedition leader's account, looked "quite new". Only Mallory and Irvine were known to have climbed there, and the axe is generally attributed to Irvine.

The "English dead", 1975. A Chinese climber, Wang Hongbao, came upon an old body during a short walk from the Chinese high camp in 1975. He spoke of it only in 1979, during a Japanese expedition, describing it to a fellow climber as an old "English dead". He was killed in an avalanche the next day.

Mallory, 1999. On 1 May 1999 Conrad Anker of the Mallory and Irvine Research Expedition found Mallory's body on the North Face, face down, in the area known as the Snow Terrace, roughly 1,000 feet below where the ice axe had lain. Two labels in the clothing read "G.L. Mallory". A broken leg and rope marks showed that he had fallen, and the expedition concluded that he had been roped to Irvine when he fell. Snow goggles were in his pocket rather than on his face, which the team read as a sign that he may have fallen after dark. Letters from his brother and sister were among his papers. No camera was found.

Irvine, 2024. In September 2024 a National Geographic documentary team, the climber and film-maker Jimmy Chin with Erich Roepke and Mark Fisher, found a hobnailed boot emerging from the ice of the Central Rongbuk Glacier, below the North Face. Inside were the remains of a foot and a sock with a label stitched "A.C. IRVINE". Days earlier the team had found an oxygen bottle dated 1933 in the area. Chin carried the remains down and handed them to the China Tibet Mountaineering Association, which oversees the north side of the mountain. The find was announced on 11 October 2024. Chin declined to give the exact location, to discourage trophy hunters. Irvine's relatives volunteered DNA samples for comparison; the registry has found no published result. No camera was found.

The camera. The pair are believed to have carried at least one Vest Pocket Kodak camera. Accounts differ over which of them had it. In 1999 Kodak specialists set out how its black-and-white film should be kept frozen and processed if it were ever recovered. It has not been.

Leading explanations

Mallory died in a fall while roped to Irvine (supported by the 1999 evidence; the place and time of the fall are unknown). The injuries, the rope marks and the position of the body support a fall. Where on the ridge it began, and whether the two were climbing up or down, cannot be read from the body.

They reached the summit before they died (a hypothesis; unproven). Its supporters point to Odell's sighting, if it was the Second Step, and to the goggles in Mallory's pocket, which the 1999 team read as a sign that he fell late in the day. After seeing the body, Anker said he now thought Mallory "may have reached the summit before he fell". The expedition itself reached no verdict: its dispatch of 25 May 1999 said the evidence "neither proves" that Mallory reached the summit, "nor proves conclusively that he did not".

They turned back or fell before reaching it (a hypothesis; unproven). At 12.50 pm they were nearly five hours behind Mallory's own schedule even on the most favourable reading of Odell's sighting, and Odell himself later doubted that reading.

Irvine's body was found by Chinese climbers and secretly removed (argued by the writer Mark Synnott; rejected by Irvine's biographer after the 2024 find). In April 2024 Synnott said that multiple sources indicated the Chinese had found Irvine and removed the body. Irvine's great-niece and biographer, Julie Summers, wrote after the find that the theory was "well and truly put to bed".

What the popular version gets wrong

"Irvine's body was found in 2024." What was found was a foot, in a boot and a sock bearing his name, on a glacier below the North Face. The rest of his body has not been found, and neither has the camera. The identification rests on the name label; a DNA comparison was planned.

"They were last seen at the Second Step, going strongly for the top." The only witness could not say which step he saw them on. Odell's first impression was the Second Step; in the expedition's account, published in 1925, he wrote that he was doubtful of it. What he recorded without qualification was the time, 12.50 pm, which was late on either reading.

"The 2024 find could settle who reached the summit first." A boot and a foot show where part of Irvine's body came to rest, not how high he climbed. Chin's own claim for it was that it "certainly reduces the search area" for the camera. Nothing found so far, on Mallory in 1999 or on the glacier in 2024, bears directly on the summit question.

Current status

Partially explained. Where both men ended up is now partly known: Mallory's body lies on the North Face, and part of Irvine was recovered from the Central Rongbuk Glacier in 2024. How Mallory died is broadly understood. Whether they reached the summit, and where and how Irvine died, are not known. The camera, if it is found with usable film, is the one object that could show how high they climbed. A published DNA match would confirm what the name label already indicates. A 2026 book by Julie Summers and the Everest historian Jochen Hemmleb revisits the evidence.

Sources

  • Norton, E. F., and other members of the expedition (1925). The Fight for Everest 1924. London: Edward Arnold. Includes N. E. Odell's chapter "Mallory and Irvine's Attempt".
  • Ruttledge, H. (1934). Everest 1933. London: Hodder and Stoughton.
  • NOVA Online (1999). Lost on Everest. PBS and WGBH: dispatches by Liesl Clark and others, May 1999, including "Mallory's Discoverers Return" (4 May), "Pieces of the Puzzle" (6 May) and "Unanswered Questions" (25 May); "The Day Mallory Was Found"; "The Search"; and the page on the Vest Pocket Kodak camera.
  • Schaffer, G. (2024). "Exclusive: Remains of Andrew 'Sandy' Irvine believed to have been found on Everest." National Geographic, 11 October 2024, updated 18 September 2025.
  • Summers, J. (2024). "When Worlds Collide." juliesummers.co.uk, 11 October 2024.
  • ITV News (2024). Report of 11 October 2024 on the finding of Irvine's remains.
  • Summers, J., and Hemmleb, J. (2026). The Everest Mystery: Sandy Irvine, George Mallory and the Truth Still Buried on Everest. Pan Macmillan. The authors' description was consulted; the book was not.

Last reviewed: September 2026. Records are provisional. Where the evidence changes, the entry changes. Found an error? Tell us.

Advertise on Anomaly Registry

A documentary archive of 175 investigated cases, read slowly and at length by an audience that arrives on purpose. Below are the current delivery figures and what is available to buy.

Figures are rolling daily averages, current as of September 2026. They are restated as the traffic changes rather than left to age quietly, and we are happy to screen-share the underlying Ad Manager and analytics reporting before an insertion order is signed.

Anomaly Registry is a reference archive rather than a feed. Every one of its 175 records is written to a fixed structure, sourced to contemporaneous documents, inquest files, peer-reviewed literature or credible reporting, and each carries a section setting out precisely what the popular version of the story gets wrong. Cases that were later explained and cases that were comprehensively debunked are kept alongside the unsolved ones, because an archive that keeps only its mysteries is not an archive. That editorial position is the reason people stay.

It also explains the shape of the traffic. A session here runs to more than four pages and close to nine minutes, which is several times what a typical content site sees. Readers arrive looking for one case, find the sources laid out, and follow the cross-references into the next record. For an advertiser, the practical consequence is that a banner on this site is in front of a settled, attentive reader for minutes rather than seconds, and it is seen repeatedly across a single visit without ever being the reason someone leaves.

Three placements are available on every page. The leaderboard sits above the masthead and accepts 728x90, 970x90 and 320x50. The in-article unit sits inside the body of the record, where the reader is already stopped, and accepts 728x90, 300x250 and 336x280. The footer unit closes the page and accepts 728x90, 970x90 and 320x50. There are three slots per page and there will not be a fourth: the inventory is deliberately limited so that each impression is worth more than it would be on a page carrying eight.

What we do not run matters as much as what we do. There are no interstitials, no pop-ups, no auto-playing video, no content-recommendation chumboxes, and nothing that reflows the page after the reader has started reading. Ads are served in reserved space so the layout does not jump. This protects viewability for the advertiser as directly as it protects the reading experience, and it is the reason we can quote the session figures above with a straight face.

The editorial environment is unusually safe for a subject area that is often anything but. This site does not publish conspiracy content, it does not promote pseudoscience, and it does not treat a rumour as a finding. Its entire method is to separate what is documented from what has merely been proposed, and to say plainly when a famous mystery has an unglamorous answer. A brand placed here sits next to sourced, corrected, carefully hedged writing rather than next to speculation dressed as news.

The readership is a general-interest one with a research habit: people who read long-form nonfiction, follow science and history coverage, and check citations. In practice the categories that fit well are books and publishing, documentary and streaming, museums and exhibitions, education and online courses, audio and podcasts, consumer technology, outdoor and travel, and financial services. If your product rewards attention and explanation rather than impulse, this is a good room to be in.

Everything is delivered through Google Ad Manager, so you can buy the way you already buy. Direct-sold campaigns can be trafficked as a guaranteed line item with standard reporting on impressions, viewability and click-through. Programmatic demand can reach the same inventory through the open auction or through a preferred deal or private marketplace at a floor we agree in advance. We accept standard IAB display creative and HTML5, and we can accommodate a reasonable third-party ad server or verification tag.

Category sponsorship is available for advertisers who want something more durable than a rotation. The register is organised into seven categories, and a sponsor can take the whole of one, appearing across every record inside it with an acknowledgement in the page furniture. Sponsorship never buys editorial influence: a sponsor cannot commission a record, cannot review one before publication, cannot have a record altered, and cannot have one removed. That rule is not negotiable and it is the thing that keeps the inventory worth buying.

Some categories are declined outright, and it is fairer to say so up front than to discover it after an insertion order. We do not accept adult content, gambling, payday or high-cost short-term credit, cryptocurrency speculation and token sales, dietary supplements making health claims, political advocacy, psychic or clairvoyant services, or anything that reads as a scare advertisement dressed up as an article. Nothing may be styled to look like a record or like part of the editorial page.

Rates depend on placement, volume, whether the buy is run-of-site or targeted to a category, and how long it runs. There is no rate card on this page because a sensible number depends on what you are trying to do, and quoting one in the abstract usually wastes both parties' time. Tell us the campaign, the flight dates and the budget you are working to, and you will get a straight answer including whether we think the fit is wrong.

To start, write to or use the contact form and mark the message for the advertising desk. Include the flight dates, the placements you want, the creative sizes you have ready and any verification requirements, and we will come back with availability and a quote. Media buyers who want the underlying analytics before committing are welcome to ask; we would rather show the reporting than be taken on trust.

Privacy Policy

This policy explains what information Anomaly Registry collects when you visit this website, why it is collected, how it is used, and what choices you have. It applies to anomalyregistry.com and to any subdomain operated by us. It was last updated on the date shown at the end of this policy, and we will revise it if our practices change.

We have designed this site to collect as little personal information as possible. You do not need an account to read anything here. There is no login, no user profile, and no comment system. In the ordinary course of reading the register, you are not asked to identify yourself, and we do not ask you to.

Like virtually every web server, ours produces access logs. These logs record the internet protocol address of the requesting device, the date and time of the request, the page or file requested, the referring page if one was sent, and the browser user agent string. These logs exist for security, abuse prevention, and diagnosing technical faults. They are retained for a limited period and then discarded. We do not use them to build profiles of individual readers.

If you write to us through the contact form, we receive whatever you choose to put into it: typically a name, an email address, and a message. We use that information for the sole purpose of reading and answering your message. Writing to us does not add you to any list, and we do not sell, rent, or trade contact details with anyone.

There is one optional mailing list, and you only join it by asking. If you submit the subscribe form we store the address you gave, the time you submitted it, the IP address it came from, and the exact wording of the consent you agreed to. We keep that record because Canadian anti-spam law expects us to be able to show when and how you asked to hear from us. The list is used to say that records have been published or materially revised, and for nothing else. Every message carries a way to leave, and asking to be removed by email works just as well.

Corrections are a special case, and worth stating plainly. If you write to point out an error in a record, we may act on that correction and revise the entry. We will not publish your name or your email address in connection with a correction unless you explicitly ask us to be credited.

This site is supported by advertising served through Google Ad Manager. Advertising technology providers may set and read cookies or similar identifiers on your device in order to select advertisements, limit how often you see the same advertisement, and measure performance. These identifiers are set by those third parties, not by us, and the data they collect is governed by their own privacy policies rather than this one.

We do not have access to the personal data that advertising partners collect, and we cannot delete it on your behalf. If you wish to limit interest-based advertising, you can adjust the advertising settings offered by Google, use your browser's cookie controls, or use the industry opt-out tools that are available in your region. Details are set out in our Cookie Policy.

We may use privacy-respecting aggregate analytics to understand which records are being read and how people move through the register. Where we do, we configure it to avoid collecting information that identifies individual readers. Aggregate figures tell us that a case page is popular; they do not tell us who read it.

We do not knowingly collect personal information from children. This site is a documentary archive intended for a general adult and older student readership. If you believe a child has sent us personal information through the contact form, write to us and we will delete it.

Depending on where you live, you may have rights over personal data relating to you, including the right to ask what we hold, to ask for a copy, to ask for correction, and to ask for deletion. Because we hold so little, these requests are usually simple to answer. Write to us and we will respond within the period required by the law that applies to you.

Our servers are located in North America, and information sent to this site is processed there. If you are visiting from elsewhere, your request necessarily crosses borders in order to reach us. By using the site you understand that this transfer takes place.

If we change this policy, the revised version will be posted here with a new date. Material changes will be noted plainly rather than buried. Questions about this policy should be sent through the contact page.

Cookie Policy

A cookie is a small text file that a website asks your browser to store, and that your browser sends back on later requests. Similar technologies, including local storage and pixel tags, do comparable work. This policy explains which of these are used on Anomaly Registry, by whom, and what you can do about them.

The registry itself is a reading site. It does not require a cookie to show you a record. We do not set cookies to track you across the internet, and we do not operate a first-party advertising identifier of our own.

Strictly necessary cookies may be set to keep the site secure and functioning, for example to help mitigate automated abuse of the contact form. These are limited in scope and are not used for advertising or profiling.

Advertising cookies are set by Google Ad Manager and by the advertising technology partners that operate within it. Their purposes include selecting which advertisement to show, capping the number of times a given advertisement is repeated, detecting invalid traffic and click fraud, and measuring whether an advertisement was actually seen.

Some of these advertising cookies support interest-based advertising, in which the advertisement you see is influenced by inferences drawn from browsing activity over time and across sites. Whether this occurs depends on your region, your settings, and the choices you have already made with those providers.

We may use aggregate analytics to count page views and understand which records are read. Where an analytics tool is used, we prefer configurations that do not identify individual readers and that do not follow readers across other websites.

We do not embed social media widgets, share buttons, or tracking pixels from social networks. This is a deliberate choice for an archive of this kind, and it removes an entire category of third-party tracking that most content sites carry.

Your browser gives you direct control over cookies. Every major browser can block third-party cookies, delete existing cookies, and clear stored data on exit. Blocking third-party cookies will not prevent you from reading anything on this site, though it may make the advertising you see less relevant.

You can also manage advertising preferences with Google directly through its advertising settings, and through the industry opt-out mechanisms operated in various regions. Because these are operated by third parties, we cannot make the choice on your behalf.

Where the law in your region requires consent before non-essential cookies are set, a consent notice will be shown and your choice will be respected. Withdrawing consent later is possible through the same mechanism.

Advertising partners may change over time. Rather than publish a list that goes stale, we identify the advertising system in use, which is Google Ad Manager, and direct you to Google's own disclosures for the current set of partners operating within it.

If you have a question about cookies on this site that this policy does not answer, write to us through the contact page and we will answer it.

Anomaly Registry is an independent documentary archive. It is published as a work of reference and public interest reporting, and it is supported by advertising. It is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any government, university, police service, coroner, scientific institution, or investigative body named in any record.

The register documents real events, including in some cases deaths, criminal investigations, and inquests. Where a record concerns a criminal matter, nothing on this site should be read as an allegation of guilt against any living person. Where an individual has been named in the public record, we report the fact of that naming and its evidentiary standing; we do not accuse.

Records are written from sources. Where a source is a primary document, we say so. Where a claim rests on secondary reporting, we say so. Where sources conflict, we state the conflict rather than quietly choosing a side. Where a widely repeated claim cannot be traced to any source, we say that too, because an untraceable claim is itself a finding.

Every record separates what is documented from what has been proposed. Hypotheses are labelled as hypotheses and attributed to whoever advanced them, together with their standing: peer-reviewed, contested, dismissed, or untested. We do not advance theories of our own.

The registry treats its own entries as provisional. Records carry a review date, and they are revised when the evidence changes. A record you read today may be corrected tomorrow, and that is a feature of the method rather than a defect in it.

Despite this method, errors will occur. If you find one, write to us. Corrections supported by evidence are made promptly, and we would rather be corrected than be consistent.

Scientific and forensic conclusions reported here are the conclusions of the researchers and officials who reached them, not ours. Reporting that a study proposed a mechanism is not an endorsement that the mechanism is correct, and the status assigned to a case reflects the state of the evidence rather than our opinion of it.

Nothing on this site is legal, medical, psychological, financial, or safety advice. Records that touch on medical or psychological matters, including mass psychogenic illness, report the diagnoses reached by clinicians at the time and afterward. They are not a substitute for professional care.

Quotations from sources are used sparingly and for the purposes of reporting, comment, criticism, and review. Copyright in quoted material remains with its owner. If you hold rights in material you believe has been used improperly, contact us and we will address it.

Original text, structure, record numbering, and editorial apparatus on this site are the property of Anomaly Registry. You are welcome to quote briefly and link to us. Wholesale reproduction of records, including reproduction for the purpose of training generative models, is not permitted without written permission.

Outbound links are provided as references. We do not control linked sites and are not responsible for their content, their accuracy, or their handling of your data.

This site is operated from British Columbia, Canada, and these notices are governed by the laws applicable there, without regard to conflict-of-law principles.

Accessibility Statement

Anomaly Registry is built to be usable by as many people as possible, including people who use screen readers, keyboard navigation, magnification, or other assistive technology. We treat accessibility as part of the build rather than as a later remediation.

We aim to meet the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines version 2.1 at level AA. This is a target we work toward continuously rather than a certification we claim to have completed.

The site is written as semantic HTML. Headings describe the real structure of a record, lists are marked up as lists, and the register is a genuine table with proper header cells, so that a screen reader can announce which column a value belongs to.

Every interactive element is reachable and operable by keyboard alone. Focus is visible at all times, and a skip link at the top of each page lets keyboard and screen reader users jump straight to the register without traversing the navigation.

Status is never conveyed by colour alone. Each status carries its written label in text, so a reader who does not perceive the colour difference between "Unsolved" and "Debunked" still receives the distinction.

Text colours have been chosen to meet or exceed the contrast ratios required at level AA against the page background. The typefaces are set at a comfortable reading size with generous line height, and the layout reflows to a single column on small screens without loss of content or function.

The site contains one animated element, an annotation on the home page. It respects the reduced-motion preference set in your operating system, and when that preference is on, the annotation appears without movement.

Text can be resized up to two hundred percent in the browser without breaking the layout or clipping content. Nothing on this site depends on a specific screen orientation.

Advertising is served by a third party. We control where advertisements are placed and label them as advertisements, but we do not control their internal markup, and their accessibility is ultimately determined by the advertiser.

We are developing an audio version of each record. When it is published, it will be an alternative way to receive the same content, not a replacement for the written entry, and the written entry will remain the authoritative version.

Accessibility work is never finished, and parts of this site will fall short of the standard we have set. If you encounter a barrier, we want to know about it. Please tell us what page you were on, what you were trying to do, and what assistive technology you were using.

Write to us through the contact page. We aim to respond within five business days and to fix genuine barriers promptly.

Terms of Use

These terms govern your use of anomalyregistry.com. By using the site you accept them. If you do not accept them, please do not use the site.

Anomaly Registry is offered as a free documentary reference. There is no account, no subscription, and no paywall, and nothing here is offered as a professional service of any kind.

You may read, quote briefly with attribution, link to, and print records for personal, educational, and research use. This is an archive, and it is meant to be used.

You may not reproduce records wholesale, republish the register or substantial parts of it, or scrape the site systematically. In particular, you may not reproduce this content for the purpose of training generative models. Permission for other uses can be requested through the contact page and is often granted.

Original text, the record numbering system, the status taxonomy, the editorial apparatus, and the design of this site are the property of Anomaly Registry. Third-party material quoted or referenced remains the property of its owners.

We work hard to make records accurate, and we correct them when they are not. Even so, the site is provided as it is, without warranty of any kind, express or implied, including any warranty of accuracy, completeness, or fitness for a particular purpose.

Records are provisional by design. A status can change, an identification can be confirmed or overturned, and a leading explanation can be displaced by a better one. Do not treat any record as a final word, and check the review date.

To the fullest extent permitted by law, Anomaly Registry and its operator are not liable for any loss or damage arising from your use of, or reliance on, anything published here.

If you send us a correction, a source, or a suggestion, you grant us permission to use it in the register. You will not be identified in connection with it unless you ask to be credited.

Do not use the contact form to send abuse, threats, spam, or automated submissions. We may block access to anyone who misuses the site or attempts to interfere with its operation.

Outbound links are provided as references and are not endorsements. We are not responsible for the content or conduct of any site we link to.

We may revise these terms. The version published here is the version in force. These terms are governed by the laws of British Columbia, Canada, and any dispute will be heard in the courts of that province.